77 . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 from the Constitution based on the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued towards the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement inside the FIR lodged by FIA and while in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
This Court may possibly interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside a fashion inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding arrived at with the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. Should the conclusion or finding is including no reasonable person would have ever attained, the Court may interfere with the conclusion or even the finding and mildew the relief to really make it correct to the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority would be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-respect the evidence or even the nature of punishment. To the aforesaid proposition, we've been fortified from the decision in the Supreme Court while in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Statutory laws are These created by legislative bodies, which include Congress at both the federal and state levels. When this type of legislation strives to shape our society, delivering rules and guidelines, it would be unattainable for any legislative body to anticipate all situations and legal issues.
criminal revision application is dismissed. reduced to the period of his detention in jail he has already undergone(Criminal Revision )
In this website post, we will delve into the details of Section 302 PPC, exploring its provisions and also the gravity of its punishment.
Free case law sites in Pakistan are invaluable resources for anyone needing to understand Pakistani law. By making use of the information and techniques outlined in this article, you could navigate these resources effectively and conduct thorough legal research.
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle set up by a court, which other courts are obligated to follow.
after release from the jail he dropped interest to contest the moment appeal , appeal is dismissed (Criminal Jail Appeal )
The regulation of necessity acknowledged and upheld by Pakistan's highest judicial body has proved an honorable protection for military adventure in civil government.it absolutely was the illegal action called legislation more info of necessity..
Legal Defenses: An accused person charged under Section 302 PPC can present legal defenses for example self-defense, insanity, or accidental killing, which may perhaps lead to reduced charges or acquittal.
three. Rule of Legislation: The court reiterated the importance of upholding the rule of legislation and ensuring that all institutions function within their constitutional mandates.
Because of this, merely citing the case is more more likely to annoy a judge than help the party’s case. Imagine it as calling anyone to tell them you’ve found their lost phone, then telling them you live in this kind of-and-this sort of neighborhood, without actually offering them an address. Driving across the neighborhood attempting to find their phone is likely to become more frustrating than it’s well worth.
The decision further directed the government of Pakistan to ascertain a commission of internationally known and recognized scientists to review and rule on long term grid station projects. In addition, the Court ordered WAPDA to immediately introduce public consultation and objection procedures for all projects concerning grid stations and power lines.